Our head writer's response, in regards to the disturbing aspects of our previous post
Someone is eager to keep this information withheld.
Evidently, considering last week our site posted a disturbing and strange set of coded messages between an unknown entity and a user named "Klatos." It would appear that this message was a coded channel of some kind, suggesting that perhaps Klatos might be communicating with another entity.
What's unclear is its authenticity. The post's message was vague, at best; references to something having "already have happened," or the entity being able to "see" Klatos.
It is the opinion of our editorial staff that the post was probably not authentic, and the hacker likely bears no relation to Klatos. After all, given we now know he was in hiding due to stalkers, a chat room with his name plastered on one of the accounts wouldn't be the most effective way of keeping a low profile.
The strangest part of all this was the source code; that particular article's source code does not match any known programming known to any international database on the trade. The most our servers can tell is that it appears in a manner almost as if the article's code had not been altered, as if it was always that way.
We'll keep you posted on the site's security as we learn more, and will publish the originally intended article next week.
留言